6 results for 'cat:"Employment" AND cat:"Due Process" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Miller finds that the trial court properly concluded that a doctor did not have a right to a hearing before his application for privileges at two hospitals was denied. The doctor had a history of unprofessional behavior at other hospitals and was the subject of a disciplinary order and public reprimand by the state medical board. The hospitals' agreement with the doctor's medical group, which established the eligibility requirements, disallowed staff privileges for doctors with such histories, and the hospitals have quasi-legislative authority to establish the requirements. Affirmed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Miller, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: A166748, Categories: employment, due Process, contract
J. Jackson dismisses a former teacher's contract and due process claims against the district after it failed to rehire him, allegedly in violation of the parties' settlement agreement. The agreement did not contain any obligation the district rehire him, nor has he sufficiently alleged a due process violation.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Jackson, Filed On: January 31, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv2137, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: employment, due Process, contract
J. Wilson finds that the district court properly rejected conspiracy and breach of contract claims brought by the superintendent in a wrongful termination and civil rights action against the city board of education and board members. The superintendent failed to sufficiently allege a conspiracy and failed to plead an exception to sovereign immunity with respect to the contract claims. However, the district court improperly dismissed the superintendent's due process claim. The district court incorrectly interpreted ambiguities in the minutes of the meeting where board members voted to terminate the superintendent's contract and failed to draw reasonable inferences in her favor. Reversed in part.
Court: 11th Circuit, Judge: Wilson, Filed On: October 4, 2023, Case #: 22-10858, Categories: employment, due Process, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Khalsa denies, in part, the city's motion to dismiss, ruling the just-cause termination and definite-tenure provisions of the city administrator's employment contract override any at-will employment provisions and grant her a protected property interest in her job; therefore, the lack of hearings or any explanation for her termination create a plausible due process claim.
Court: USDC New Mexico, Judge: Khalsa, Filed On: September 21, 2023, Case #: 1:22cv802, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment, due Process, contract